While the rise of anti-homeless architecture increases, there are quite a few opinions and controversial conversations that can be said about it. Anti-homeless architecture is often seen as a structure preventing those in need of a bed from sleeping on. “I noticed benches are individually spaced, that prevents people from sitting and laying down.” McKenna Hawkins reported, stating her visual notice. “Benches separates the whole thing, and it prevents sleeping.” Jurnee Bouldin added. Explaining how the structure is built to prevent anyone from lying on it.
While cities and governments continue to fund anti homeless architecture, many people have a lot to say about the idea. “It's very unnecessary putting money into anti homeless architecture when we can use that money to fix the homelessness issue.” Mckenna explained. “Cities can start funding shelters instead of funding architecture.” She included, suggesting what cities could do instead. Adrian Garcia suggested, “Cities can start programs, festivals, fairs, and fun activities to help raise money for the homeless.” “The public can donate and help fund money to support the homeless.” he added. “The government should open more homeless shelters where it allows a lot of people, people should be adding more amenities and stuff that can help the homeless.” Jurnee Bouldin stated, giving options and ideas on what society can do to help those in need.
While anti-homeless architecture can be popular in quite some areas. It is possible it could affect on how people view the environment. “Anti-homeless architecture to some places may be seen as clean and healthy, while to others bad and people may not visit.” Jurnee Bouldin explained. Adrian Garcia stated. “Architecture shows people about an area, it can give a presentable environment or a hateful one.” “Anti-homeless architecture can affect population; they can drive people away due to the unfriendly environment.” he described. While cities continue adding this type of architecture, many others are seen to be against it. Many see it as harmful, or unpleasing for an area's reputation. However, opinions on the topic are diverse. Some may agree with the architecture, finding it beneficial, while others may dislike it.
While cities and governments continue to fund anti homeless architecture, many people have a lot to say about the idea. “It's very unnecessary putting money into anti homeless architecture when we can use that money to fix the homelessness issue.” Mckenna explained. “Cities can start funding shelters instead of funding architecture.” She included, suggesting what cities could do instead. Adrian Garcia suggested, “Cities can start programs, festivals, fairs, and fun activities to help raise money for the homeless.” “The public can donate and help fund money to support the homeless.” he added. “The government should open more homeless shelters where it allows a lot of people, people should be adding more amenities and stuff that can help the homeless.” Jurnee Bouldin stated, giving options and ideas on what society can do to help those in need.
While anti-homeless architecture can be popular in quite some areas. It is possible it could affect on how people view the environment. “Anti-homeless architecture to some places may be seen as clean and healthy, while to others bad and people may not visit.” Jurnee Bouldin explained. Adrian Garcia stated. “Architecture shows people about an area, it can give a presentable environment or a hateful one.” “Anti-homeless architecture can affect population; they can drive people away due to the unfriendly environment.” he described. While cities continue adding this type of architecture, many others are seen to be against it. Many see it as harmful, or unpleasing for an area's reputation. However, opinions on the topic are diverse. Some may agree with the architecture, finding it beneficial, while others may dislike it.
